I think the main question that Butler is addressing in
Gender Trouble is whether gender is a preconstructed norm established by
exclusion on a cultural level that people just assimilate to, or is it an
identity which we choose to relate to at a certain point? She is also saying if it is the
preconstructed norm, why is it necessary to understand gender through
exclusion? If feminism is a
product of the cultural exclusion of women, but itself is understood through
the cultural exclusion of men, isn’t it’s result or understanding
contradictory? “Is there some commonality among ‘women’ that preexists their
oppression, or do ‘women’ have a bond by virtue of their oppression alone? Is there a specificity to women’s
cultures that is independent of their subordination by hegemonic, masculinist
cultures? (5) I do believe that gender groups result from pre-established
cultural norms, and that based on your sex you are expected to assimilate to
these standards. However, I do
believe that this is a result of human construction and a human desire for
understanding and simplifying. I
think it is possible for a sex to relate more with whatever gender they
identify with better, based on genetics and how they were raised. I think at some point one is expected
to conform to these constructed gender identities, and if they don’t they are
given an “other” status.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.